2024 Rizk v. holder 629 f3d 1083 9th cir. 2011

Rizk v. holder 629 f3d 1083 9th cir. 2011

Author: bnyu

August undefined, 2024

WebNov 30, 2024 · Kumar received such an opportunity to explain the inconsistency when he was cross-examined by the government. See Rizk v. Holder, 629 F.3d 1083, 1088 (9th Cir. 2011) (“[T]he opportunity to explain may be provided through cross-examination by the government, or even direct examination by the alien's own attorney․”) (internal citations ... WebApr 28, 2024 · Shrestha v. Holder, 590 F.3d 1034, 1039–40 (9th Cir. 2010). In general, adverse credibility findings “are conclusive unless any reasonable adjudicator would be compelled to conclude to the contrary.” Rizk v. Holder, 629 F.3d 1083, 1087 (9th Cir. 2011) (quoting 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B)). We review de novo questions of law. Bhattarai v.

ZHOU QIN HAUNG v. BARR (2024) FindLaw

WebJan 3, 2011 · Adverse credibility determination in asylum proceeding was supported by substantial evidence where alien failed to reconcile numerous contradictions in his … Web14 (quoting Rizk v. Holder, 629 F.3d 1083,1088 (9th Cir. 2011).) • “It is reasonable and plausible that the trauma caused by multiple physical and sexual assaults would impair … tail fairing

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

On appeal, Attia argues that the BIA failed to address her challenge to the IJ's adverse credibility determination regarding her testimony. We agree. The BIA's opinion states: "The respondents consist of a married couple and their two children. For purposes of this order, reference to `the respondent' will refer to the lead male … See more Rizk claims that the IJ's adverse credibility determination was not supported by substantial evidence. Where, as here, the BIA expressly adopts the IJ's decision, we … See more Applying these principles, we begin by considering whether the factual discrepancies in Rizk's testimony constitute substantial evidence supporting the IJ's … See more WebDec 6, 2024 · Rizk v. Holder, 629 F.3d 1083, 1088 (9th Cir. 2011) (quoting Soto-Olarte v. Holder, 555 F.3d 1089, 1091 (9th Cir. 2009)); Soto-Olarte, 555 F.3d at 1091 (“Because the … WebSee, e.g., Rizk v. Holder, 629 F.3d 1083, 1088 (9th Cir. 2011) (stating that “an [Immigration Judge] cannot base an adverse credibility determination on a contradiction that the alien … tail fanning

BARBOSA v. BARR 919 F.3d 1169 (2024) By GRABER

WebJan 3, 2011 · Adverse credibility determination in asylum proceeding was supported by substantial evidence where alien failed to reconcile numerous contradictions in his testimony (Ikuta, J.) WebSep 23, 2013 · Rizk v. Holder, 629 F.3d 1083, 1087 (9th Cir.2011). Under the substantial evidence standard, an adverse credibility finding is “conclusive unless any reasonable adjudicator would be compelled to conclude to the contrary.” Id. … twig realise crossword clueWebJun 13, 2011 · Holder, 629 F.3d 1154, 1158 (9th Cir. 2011); see also Rizk v. Holder, 629 F.3d 1083, 1088 (9th Cir. 2011) ("[M]inor inconsistencies regarding non-material and trivial … twig realise

"WebNov 27, 2024 · Holder, 629 F.3d 1083, 1087 (9th Cir. 2011) (quoting 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B)). We afford a “healthy measure of deference to agency credibility determinations,” mindful that “IJs are in the best position to assess demeanor and other credibility cues that we cannot readily access [sic] on review.” " - Rizk v. holder 629 f3d 1083 9th cir. 2011

Rizk v. holder 629 f3d 1083 9th cir. 2011

WebMar 5, 2024 · Sandoval v. Sessions, 866 F.3d 986, 993 (9th Cir. 2024). On the merits of the divisibility inquiry, the government did not argue to us that section 164.395 is divisible. We therefore deem the issue waived. See Rizk v. Holder, 629 F.3d 1083, 1091 n.3 (9th Cir. 2011) (holding that issues not raised in the opening brief are waived). WebDec 11, 2024 · Holder, 629 F.3d 1083, 1088 (9th Cir. 2011). The BIA may rest an adverse credibility determination on an inconsistency or inaccuracy “without regard to whether” it “goes to the heart of the applicant’s claim.” 8 U.S.C. § 1158(b)(1)(B)(iii). 10 QIU V. BARR Although that standard is deferential, there must be a “specific cogent reason” for an …

Did you know?

WebJun 12, 2014 · Rizk v. Holder, 629 F.3d 1083, 1088–89 (9th Cir.2011) (“Because we must uphold the IJ's adverse credibility determination so long as even one basis is supported by substantial evidence, we focus on one of the key contradictions the IJ identified.” (internal citation omitted) (emphasis added)). WebJan 22, 1992 · Rizk v. Holder, 629 F.3d 1083 (9th Cir. 2011) This opinion cites 15 opinions. 6 references to Preet Kaur v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney General, 418 F.3d 1061 (9th Cir. …

WebBhattarai v. Lynch, 835 F.3d 1037, 1042 (9th Cir. 2016). We review factual findings for substantial evidence. Id. To reverse a credibility determination in particular, “we must find that the evidence not only supports [a contrary] conclusion, but compels it.” Rizk v. Holder, 629 F.3d 1083, 1087 (9th Cir. 2011) (alteration in original ... WebJan 22, 2014 · See Rizk v. Holder, 629 F.3d 1083 , 1087 n.2 (9th Cir. 2011). Singh filed an application for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against …

WebRizk v. Holder, 629 F.3d 1083, 1088 (9th Cir. 2011), overruled in part on other grounds by Alam, 11 F. 4th 1133. If the noncitizen offers an explanation that is “reasonable and plausible,” the IJ has to provide a “specific and cogent reason for rejecting” the explanation. WebOct 19, 2024 · Holder, 629 F.3d 1083, 1088 (9th Cir. 2011)). In this case, the BIA affirmed the IJ's adverse credibility determination largely based on a finding that Dong testified inconsistently about two aspects of his story—(1) the number of times he was interrogated, and (2) the extent of his injuries from the second interrogation.

WebFeb 22, 2024 · Garland, 37 F.4th 626, 632 (9th Cir. 2024), we deny the petition for review. 1. Alcantar-Garcia forfeited any challenge to the denial of CAT protection or asylum because …

WebDec 6, 2024 · Rizk v. Holder, 629 F.3d 1083, 1088 (9th Cir. 2011) (quoting Soto-Olarte v. Holder, 555 F.3d 1089, 1091 (9th Cir. 2009)); Soto-Olarte, 555 F.3d at 1091 (“Because the BIA’s opinion does not refer to the explanation that [petitioner] gave . . . and does not give the BIA’s reasons for considering that explanation tail fallWebMar 28, 2024 · Sandoval v. Sessions, 866 F.3d 986, 993 (9th Cir. 2024). On the merits of the divisibility inquiry, the government did not argue to us that section 164.395 is divisible. We … tail fanning in birdsWebSee Rizk v. Holder, 629 F.3d 1083, 1091 n.3 (9th Cir. 2011) (finding that issues not raised in a brief are deemed waived); Martinez-Serrano v. INS, 94 F.3d 1256, 1259 (9th Cir. 1996) … twig recommerceWebDec 22, 2015 · See, e.g., Rizk v. Holder, 629 F.3d 1083, 1091 n.3 (9th Cir. 2011) (“[B]ecause [the petitioner] did not raise [certain arguments] in his opening brief, we deem those issues waived.”); Smith v. Marsh, 194 F.3d 1045, 1052 (9th Cir. 1999) (holding that arguments not raised in a party’s opening brief generally are waived). twig reduceWebApr 14, 2024 · Bhattarai v. Lynch, 835 F.3d 1037, 1042 (9th Cir. 2016). We review factual findings for substantial evidence. Id. To reverse a credibility determination in particular, “we must find that the evidence not only supports [a contrary] conclusion, but compels it.” Rizk v. Holder, 629 F.3d 1083, 1087 (9th Cir. 2011) (alteration in original ... twi great abingtonWebSubstantial evidence supports the adverse credibility finding. Shrestha v. Holder, 590 F.3d 1034, 1039 (9th Cir. 2010). We must uphold an adverse credibility determination if substantial evidence supports even one ground relied on. Rizk v. Holder, 629 F.3d 1083, 1088–89 (9th Cir ... Cole v. Holder, 659 F.3d 762, 771–72 (9th Cir. 2011). 3 ... twig replace examples tail fct